Join! it's $20

Split GCSB into Completely Independent Signals Intelligence and Cybersecurity Entities

Split GCSB into Completely Independent Signals Intelligence and Cybersecurity Entities

Split GCSB into Independent Signals Intelligence and Cybersecurity Entities This measure would prevent cybersecurity being used as a cover for mass surveillance..

Showing 7 reactions

How would you tag this suggestion?

Sign in with

Or sign in with email

    Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
    • Luka Love
      commented 2016-11-30 14:48:01 +1300
      This is a very good idea. At the very least there needs to be more transparency around how they operate and coordinate with their international counterparts and what/how they communicate with the SIS. Specific and independent mandates are important.
    • Luka Love
      tagged this with important 2016-11-30 14:48:01 +1300
    • Sue Rine
      tagged this with low priority 2016-11-29 19:12:46 +1300
    • Nathan Rattray
      tagged this with low priority 2016-11-29 11:56:38 +1300
    • Graeme Kiyoto-Ward
      commented 2016-11-28 06:54:56 +1300
      Interesting. There’s a challenge in that combining agencies builds economy of scale. Splitting them maintains focus and prevents overreach. Just a challenge to work through. Certainly Key’s bill made a lot of noise at the time. A vote attracting minor policy?
    • Graeme Kiyoto-Ward
      tagged this with interesting 2016-11-28 06:54:55 +1300
    • Matt Walkington
      published this page in Suggestions 2016-11-28 00:48:24 +1300