Our Team Auckland Central | Tuariki Delamere Banks Peninsula | Ben Atkinson Bay of Plenty | Chris Jenkins Coromandel | Rob Hunter Dunedin | Ben Peters Epsom | Adriana Christie Hamilton East | Naomi Pocock Hamilton West | Hayden Cargo Hutt South | Ben Wylie-van Eerd Mount Albert | Cameron Lord Nelson | Mathew Pottinger New Plymouth | Dan Thurston-Crow North Shore | Shai Navot Northland | Helen Jeremiah Ōhāriu | Jessica Hammond Rongotai | Geoff Simmons Southland | Joel Rowlands Tauranga | Andrew Caie Te Atatū | Brendon Monk Wellington Central | Abe Gray Whangārei | Ciara Swords
- News & Events
Ask a question about policy #1
We are going to do our best to get back to as many questions about our tax policy as possible. If there is something you don't understand, ask question below and we will get back to you. Before posting a question please make sure you have read the FAQ's
Read other people's questions below before posting, someone may have already asked your question
Why would you take away the right of the elderly to leave their home to their family? Shouldn't it be their right to choose whether they do or not and not be told to invest in businesses etc? Also, if they do sell when they're older, for whatever reason, how much are you going to tax them? I think this will just encourage them to sell earlier and put their funds into potentially unsafe investments as a number of elderly are not schooled very well on investment
We have a 650ha family owned and run sheep and beef farm, GV of around $3m, equity of $2.5m. Last few years average profit around $100k maybe less which isn't much when it needs to be divided up between several family members. So the farm is probably a fairly unproductive asset by your standards, would this mean it gets hammered with extra tax? Cheers
There are empty sections on my street that have been empty for years. By targeting houses and not the land they're on, there doesn't seem to be any incentive for people to build or sell to someone who will build.
Hi there, You've covered off over 65s with an IRD loan, but you haven't answered the question regarding low/no income households. I have family and friends under 65 in varying situations. Losing an income, permanent disability, redundancy, long term employment to name a few. They would have no ability to pay, and no bank would lend them money for this purpose. They're already struggling to pay rates, how will you deal with this group of non-retirees?
All economic policy should be readily explainable with a graph, otherwise it is simply too complex.
Heritage properties may not be the most economically efficient use of available land/assets, but nevertheless contribute an intangible good to society. Won't it make it harder to justify conservation?
I know you're open to what the deemed rate should be but just wondering if you think it needs to be lower than say the return people can get on a TD with a bank? If not, it will mean savers are penalised slightly correct? But if so, then won't the rate be too low to make a big difference when interest rates are so low? I also realise most savers will benefit from an income tax reduction but not all. Thanks very much and keep up the good work.
Over in a small town in Yorkshire they have done this To supply healthy food to poor families and the homeless. It could make huge difference in new Zealand especially here in Christchurch we have all this empty red zones why aren't we using that land to grow free food and could get local schools to look after the food so doesn't cost heaps and it's teaching them how to grow own food and to give service to the community
Hi there I'm wondering have you looked into tiny houses and setting up land to lease in sections to people wanting live in tiny houses basically sub divisions of tiny houses and set up as a social housing trust and use the money made go back into local economy like education I'm part of a tiny house committee starting up in Christchurch to try and make this a reality and also work with local concills to ease regulations on them but if someone like yourself was to make it a parliament issue it could change so many peoples lives tiny houses have already taken off over seas as a way to keep up with housing issues and make affordable housing for low income people one issue we still facing is getting banks onside to lend money ATM we only know of one and they only just started doing it this makes huge hurdle for people wanting to build there tiny house thank your for your time read my message I look forward to your response
Hi Gareth. Would you please confirm that it is only a person's or business's total or net equity (asset valuations minus debts) that will be subject to the minimum income assessment. Will loan interest repayments be deducted for the purposes of calculating total income being generated by an asset (to then be compared with the minimum). -Matt
Like this page to spread the word
Do you like this page?