- Policy
-
Candidates
Candidates Auckland Central | Tuariki Delamere Banks Peninsula | Ben Atkinson Bay of Plenty | Chris Jenkins Coromandel | Rob Hunter Dunedin | Ben Peters Epsom | Adriana Christie Hamilton East | Naomi Pocock Hamilton West | Hayden Cargo Hutt South | Ben Wylie-van Eerd Mount Albert | Cameron Lord Nelson | Mathew Pottinger New Plymouth | Dan Thurston-Crow North Shore | Shai Navot Northland | Helen Jeremiah Ōhāriu | Jessica Hammond Rongotai | Geoff Simmons Southland | Joel Rowlands Tauranga | Andrew Caie Te Atatū | Brendon Monk Wellington Central | Abe Gray Whangārei | Ciara Swords
- Comms & Events
- Support
Outlaw polystyrene drink and food containers
Polystyrene internationally and everywhere is the least or almost impossible to recycle plastic and is killing seabirds. We should follow california and bam pilystyrene food containers and cups
Do you like this suggestion?
-
Luka Love commented 2016-12-02 10:09:58 +1300Yeah, that’s a very good point Tim. Perhaps included in the legislation could be a standardised definition of terms including “biodegradable” to mean biodegradable under the normal (perhaps even regionally specific) environmental conditions these products will end up, i.e. Landfill.
-
Tim O’Donnell commented 2016-12-01 20:07:55 +1300Be careful when talking biodegradable. There are plastic bags etc that are listed as such but they’re only biodegradable when exposed to constant weather (air, sun & rain). This means they are useless when put into landfill (which is where most of it goes). It’s a nasty trick on people trying to do the right thing
-
John Rusk tagged this with important 2016-11-30 21:11:48 +1300
-
Gene Dalefield tagged this with important 2016-11-30 15:21:47 +1300
-
Luka Love commented 2016-11-30 14:50:22 +1300As has been pointed out by a couple of others, this could part of a more comprehensive policy on waste reduction specifically around non-biodegradable and hazardous wastes. The definition of hazardous being broader than just “to humans”
-
Luka Love tagged this with important 2016-11-30 14:50:21 +1300
-
Luka Love tagged this with essential 2016-11-30 14:50:21 +1300
-
Graeme Kiyoto-Ward commented 2016-11-30 09:23:15 +1300One policy here if banning is the plan. I would say that using taxes to disincentivize is a better approach. Makes it Environment and Taxation. My view is add a balancing tax where a producer of consumer can externalize costs (from polluter to environment).
-
Graeme Kiyoto-Ward tagged this with interesting 2016-11-30 09:23:14 +1300
-
Graeme Kiyoto-Ward tagged this with important 2016-11-30 09:23:14 +1300
-
Tam Eaton tagged this with important 2016-11-30 07:43:43 +1300
-
Anna White tagged this with important 2016-11-30 07:42:34 +1300
-
Alexandra Hallatt commented 2016-11-30 06:47:21 +1300This makes sense as part of a broader policy to reduce waste.
-
Alexandra Hallatt tagged this with interesting 2016-11-30 06:47:21 +1300
-
Tim O’Donnell commented 2016-11-29 22:19:10 +1300Ban it or tax it at a high rate. Either way it needs to go. We need to do something about excessive packaging with plastics too
-
Tim O’Donnell tagged this with interesting 2016-11-29 22:19:09 +1300
-