- Policy
-
Candidates
Candidates Auckland Central | Tuariki Delamere Banks Peninsula | Ben Atkinson Bay of Plenty | Chris Jenkins Coromandel | Rob Hunter Dunedin | Ben Peters Epsom | Adriana Christie Hamilton East | Naomi Pocock Hamilton West | Hayden Cargo Hutt South | Ben Wylie-van Eerd Mount Albert | Cameron Lord Nelson | Mathew Pottinger New Plymouth | Dan Thurston-Crow North Shore | Shai Navot Northland | Helen Jeremiah Ōhāriu | Jessica Hammond Rongotai | Geoff Simmons Southland | Joel Rowlands Tauranga | Andrew Caie Te Atatū | Brendon Monk Wellington Central | Abe Gray Whangārei | Ciara Swords
- Comms & Events
- Support
Reform Property Policy
- Property zoning should be made at a national level, taking the decisions about property density changes out of the hands of local councils. - encourage use of pre fabricated housing solutions - address lack of competition/monopoly position of building material suppliers - remove the outsized advanatages of property investment over other forms of business investment (ringfence losses from negatively geared property, tax on all capital gains from investment property sales) - restrict property ownership to NZ residents only - incentivies for home electricity generation/storage and rainwater collection systems.
Do you like this suggestion?
-
Kirk Burgess commented 2016-11-28 10:50:08 +1300THanks for the feedback. In regards to central government being in charge of zoning – I agree there is some risk of lack of knowledge leading to some poor decisions. However under the current system there is vast amounts of entrenched NIMBYism (Not In My BackYard-ism) that prevents logical well reasoned zoning changes. In my option the benefits of a new independent national entity would outweigh the potential negatives. -
Nathan Shaw commented 2016-11-28 10:23:41 +1300I’ve seen some absolutely shocking (poor) things come out of the bureaucrat down in Wellington. Largely caused by their lack of local knowledge. So I wouldn’t support property zoning being driven by bureaucrats from central government. But agree the rest of the suggestions.
-
Nathan Shaw tagged this with dislike 2016-11-28 10:23:41 +1300
-
Nathan Shaw tagged this with important 2016-11-28 10:23:41 +1300
-
Rohan Light tagged this with important 2016-11-26 12:44:01 +1300 -
Graeme Kiyoto-Ward commented 2016-11-25 21:24:10 +1300I like this: “remove the outsized advanatages of property investment over other forms of business investment (ringfence losses from negatively geared property, tax on all capital gains from investment property sales).” And I like this as well: “incentivies for home electricity generation/storage and rainwater collection systems.”
-
Graeme Kiyoto-Ward tagged this with interesting 2016-11-25 21:24:10 +1300
-
Graeme Kiyoto-Ward tagged this with important 2016-11-25 21:24:10 +1300
-
Tim O’Donnell commented 2016-11-25 15:45:22 +1300I’m not sure I agree with the first half of this post but fully agree with the second half. Incentives for the electricity & water collection are great. They add to a greener environment at the same time as reducing the costs on our national grids. Seems logical to catch water: less water treatment, reduced stormwater & less strain during drought times
-
Tim O’Donnell tagged this with essential 2016-11-25 15:45:22 +1300
-
Nelson Glass tagged this with essential 2016-11-25 15:43:47 +1300
-
Nathan Rattray tagged this with important 2016-11-25 15:17:05 +1300 -
Nathan Rattray tagged this with essential 2016-11-25 15:17:04 +1300
-